MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117961448 · doi:10.21432/t20w2q

« Le sac d’école électronique »: un outil technologique pouvant faciliter la mise en place de l’alignement curriculaire / The “digital school bag”: A technological tool to facilitate the implementation of curriculum alignment

2012· article· fr· W2117961448 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marie-Pierrette Ntyonga-Pono, Jacques Raynauld, Olivier Gerbé

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Learning and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article discute des réformes du système éducatif québécois qui s’inscrivent dans le courant des réformes entreprises un peu partout dans le monde avec des résultats variables. Plusieurs facteurs sont évoqués parmi lesquels le manque de formation et de soutien des enseignants, malgré les actions du ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport du Québec qui a confié la recherche de moyens de soutien à différents organismes dont la Maison des technologies de formation et d'apprentissage Roland-Giguère (MATI Montréal) qui a conçu un logiciel «le sac d’école» peu connu et utilisé. Le but de cet article est de présenter cet outil technologique et comment il peut permettre d’atteindre l’alignement curriculaire, élément clé de toute réussite de réforme éducative. This paper discusses the education-system reforms in Quebec, which follow the same trends as reforms undertaken elsewhere in the world with various results. Several factors are invoked, among which is the lack of training and support for teachers despite the efforts of Quebec’s Ministère de l’Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport, which assigned various organizations to looks into support methods. These organizations included the Maison des technologies de formation et d’apprentissage Roland-Giguère (MATI Montréal), which designed a “school bag” software that is little used. The paper introduces the technological tool and shows how it can help in reaching curriculum alignment, a key element for the success of educational reforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Learning and TechnologySame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207