Macrolides do not affect the incidence of moderate and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in symptomatic ureaplasma‐positive infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in symptomatic ureaplasma-positive treated preterm infants and asymptomatic preterm infants not tested or treated for ureaplasma. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted in a tertiary, neonatal unit between January 2007 and December 2012. Infants ≤29 completed weeks with signs and symptoms suggesting ureaplasma pneumonia who received macrolides comprised the study group. Infants ≤29 weeks without signs and symptoms not tested or treated with macrolides were the controls. Infants were mandatorily matched for gestational age ± one week or birthweight ± 100 grams. RESULTS: There were 31 infants in the study group and 62 in the control group. The baseline demographic data of both groups were similar on the whole. The incidence of moderate and severe BPD, defined by oxygen dependency or the need for continuous positive airway pressure at 36 weeks of postconceptual age, was 45.2% in the study group and 40.3% in the controls (p = 0.65). There was no significant difference in morbidities or mortality between the groups. CONCLUSION: A selective approach of treating symptomatic ureaplasma-positive preterm infants with macrolides did not affect the incidence of moderate and severe BPD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".