MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118066476 · doi:10.1002/app.29059

Experimental determination of concentration‐dependent carbon dioxide diffusivity in LDPE

2008· article· en· W2118066476 on OpenAlexaff
J. Tendulkar, Simant R. Upreti, Ali Lohi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityLow-density polyethyleneThermodynamicsIsothermal processCarbon dioxideMass transferDiffusionWork (physics)PolymerMaterials scienceGaseous diffusionPolyethyleneChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this work, we experimentally determine the concentration‐dependent diffusivity of carbon dioxide in low‐density poly(ethylene) (LDPE). For this purpose, experiments are carried out to obtain pressure‐decay data for isothermal diffusion of the gas in the polymer. Based on a detailed mass transfer model, variational calculus is used to establish the conditions necessary to yield the concentration‐dependent diffusivity that enables the model‐predicted mass of absorbed gas in polymer to match with the experimental counterpart. A computational algorithm is implemented to solve the model and the conditions and obtain the diffusivities. Determined at 120 and 130°C for four different pressures in the range 0.352 to 1.232 MPa, the diffusivities are strong unimodal functions of gas concentration in polymer and of the order 10 −9 m 2 s −1 . Mathematical correlations are developed to calculate the diffusivity at a given temperature, pressure, and gas concentration. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer Foaming and CompositesFrench-language works237,207