MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118078183 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-7765

Overview of Japan-Canada Joint Collaboration Satellites (JC2Sat) GNC Challenges and Design

2010· article· en· W2118078183 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alfred Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Computer scienceAeronauticsSystems engineeringEngineeringArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Japan Canada Joint Collaboration Satellites – Formation Flight (JC2Sat-FF) project is a joint project between the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). This paper presents an overview of JC2Sat mission and discusses unique GNC challenges and solutions with focus on attitude control subsystem (ACS) and relative navigation subsystem (RNS). Preliminary simulations are presented to validate that the design requirements are satisfied by proposed design techniques. Nomenclature Ad = desired geocentric separation latitude prop g sat ( ) a R = satellite gravitational acceleration including only the two-body and J2 perturbation accelerations B = earth magnetic field vector expressed in satellite body coordinates hy e = angular momentum error about the satellite pitch axis h = satellite angular momentum vector expressed in satellite body coordinates h % = satellite angular momentum error vector expressed in satellite body coordinates d h = desired angular momentum vector expressed in satellite body coordinates dw h = desired angular momentum about the satellite pitch axis i = inclination I = satellite moment of inertia matrix expressed in satellite body coordinates 1 2 , , k k k = control gains vo ro k k , = constant gains vr rr k k , = constant gains m = magnetorquer dipole moment vector expressed in the satellite body frame max m = magnetorquer limit vector r = an upper-bound on the covariance of the GPS absolute or relative position error

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control ConferenceSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207