MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Spatially extended absorption around the<i>z</i>= 2.63 radio galaxy MRC 2025−218: outflow or infall?

2008· article· en· W2118104650 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio galaxyGalaxySpectroscopyOutflowX-shaped radio galaxyAbsorption (acoustics)Active galactic nucleusEmission spectrum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an investigation into the absorber in front of the z = 2.63 radio galaxy MRC 2025-218, using integral field spectroscopy obtained at the Very Large Telescope, and longslit spectroscopy obtained at the Keck II telescope.The properties of MRC 2025-218 are particularly conducive to study the nature of the absorbing gas, i.e. this galaxy shows bright and spatially extended Lyα emission, along with bright continuum emission from the active nucleus.Lyα absorption is detected across ∼40 × 30 kpc 2 , has a covering factor of ∼1, and shows remarkably little variation in its properties across its entire spatial extent.This absorber is kinematically detached from the extended emission line region (EELR).Its properties suggest that the absorber is outside of the EELR.We derive lower limits to the H I, H II and H column densities for this absorber of 3 × 10 16 , 7 × 10 17 and 2 × 10 18 cm -2 , respectively.Moreover, the relatively bright emission from the active nucleus has allowed us to measure a number of metal absorption lines: C I, C II, C IV, N V, O I, Si II, Si IV, Al II and Al III.The column density ratios are most naturally explained using photoionization by a hard continuum, with an ionization parameter U ∼ 0.0005-0.005.Shocks or photoionization by young stars cannot reproduce satisfactorily the measured column ratios.Using the ratio between the Si II * and Si II column densities, we derive a lower limit of ≥10 cm -3 for the electron density of the absorber.The data do not allow useful constraints to be placed on the metallicity of the absorber.We consider two possibilities for the nature of this absorber: the cosmological infall of gas, and an outflow driven by supernovae or the radio jets.We find it plausible that the absorber around 2025-218 is in outflow.We also find good agreement between the observed properties of the H I absorber and the properties of the H I absorption expected from the cosmological infall model of Barkana & Loeb.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→