The role of complexation and competition in the biouptake of europium by a unicellular alga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short-term (60 min) europium (Eu) biouptake fluxes by the freshwater green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were investigated in the presence and absence of ligands (e.g., malic acid and citric acid) and a second rare earth metal, samarium (Sm). Data were interpreted in the context of the biotic ligand model, which uses experimentally determined stability constants to take into account the competition and complexation of the metal of interest. In the absence of ligands or competitors, Eu biouptake was well described by a Michaelis-Menten equation with the maximal uptake flux (Jmax ) and Michaelis-Menten constant (Km ) of Jmax = 1.7 × 10(-14) mol cm(-2) s(-1) and Km = 10(-7.0) M (corresponding to an affinity constant of 10(7.0) M(-1) ). Biouptake of Eu (or Sm) decreased as the concentration of a competing rare earth element (i.e., Sm or Eu) increased, as predicted by the biotic ligand model. On the other hand, when hydrophilic complexes were formed with citric and malic acid, Eu biouptake was much greater than predicted on the basis of free ion concentrations alone. Overall, the results showed that for C. reinhardtii the rare earth elements were likely to share a common biouptake pathway; biouptake of one rare earth element was reduced when another was present, and rare earth element complexes were bioavailable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".