Online Education and Learning Management Systems: Global e-Learning in a Scandinavian Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morten Flate Paulsen has been working in the field of distance and online education for many years.During the last 15 to 20 years, the author has been particularly active in developing online education projects, and is considered a pioneer in this field.The author brings this book his rich background in e-learning, much of which was gained while working at the NKI College at Bekkestua, Oslo, Norway.The book captures his experiences, discusses major developments in online education, and provides illustrative examples from the author's Scandinavian and international research.Paulsen also invited other Scandinavian-based pioneers, Søren Nipper (Denmark) and Carl Holmberg (Sweden), to contribute their personal experiences grounded within their particular national contexts.Paulsen has adopted an original approach with his book, one that mixes a theoretical framework, anecdotes, with personal experiences.This approach makes the book really "interesting and enjoyable" as the outside back cover says, an assertion that I fully agree is true.I also located three online reviews written on Dr. Paulsen's book: one by Desmond Keegan (Dublin, Ireland) 1 who considers it is a major book; another by Christian Dalsgaard (Aarhus, Denmark) 2 who maintains "The book provides an important promotion of Nordic online education and a significant contribution to the international field;" and Kjell Å Bringsrud (Oslo, Norway) 3 who highly recommends it.After reading the book, I too agree with these previous reviewers that Paulsen's book will be of great interest for: "students, teachers, course designers, administrators, decision makers and educational officers in public and private sectors" (p.17).My only concern is that researchers seem to have been neglected in the book's target audience -but perhaps this editorial viewpoint may also be interpreted as an indicator of the pragmatic, practice-oriented approach developed by the author in compiling and writing this book.Professor Paulsen's book is comprised of four parts:1. Online Education, Teaching and Learning 2. Commercial and Self-Developed LMS 3. Global e-Learning in a Nordic perspective 4. Trends and Future Developments
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".