MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118154735 · doi:10.1109/tia.2010.2049814

Development and Testing of a New Controlled Wavelet-Modulated Inverter for IPM Motor Drives

2010· article· en· W2118154735 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterVoltageControl theory (sociology)Induction motorComputer scienceTorqueMotor driveDigital signal processorVector controlDigital signal processingEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development, implementation, and performance testing of a novel resolution-level vector controller (RLVC) for a wavelet-modulated (WM) inverter-fed interior permanent-magnet (IPM) motor drive system. The RLVC is designed to adjust the output voltage of the WM inverter in response to changes in the load torque and command speed. The adjustments in the WM inverter output voltage is accomplished through changing the maximum value of the scalejthat is required to generate the WM inverter switching signals. The complete IPM motor drive system incorporating the RLVC is successfully implemented in real time using a digital signal processor board ds1104 for a laboratory 1-hp IPM motor. The performances of the proposed RLVC IPM motor drive system are investigated at different dynamic operating conditions, including sudden changes in the command speed and load torque. The simulated and experimental performance results show stable, fast, and accurate adjustments of the inverter output voltage in response to load and speed changes in the tested IPM motor drive system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207