MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118241272 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl080

Chronotropic incompetence in young patients with late postoperative atrial flutter: a case-control study

2006· article· en· W2118241272 on OpenAlexaff
N. Anand

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersEuropean Society of Cardiology
KeywordsMedicineAtrial flutterCardiologyChronotropicInternal medicineFlutterAtrial fibrillationAnesthesiaHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Atrial flutter causes late postoperative morbidity in congenital heart disease (CHD). Sinoatrial node dysfunction is associated with late postoperative atrial flutter, but pacing interventions driven by minimum heart rates (HR) have yielded mixed results. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective case-control study was used to test the hypothesis that late postoperative atrial flutter is associated with chronotropic incompetence in active young CHD patients. Control CHD patients aged < or =18 years without documented supraventricular ectopy (n = 42) were matched with 42 patients (cases) having atrial flutter onset > or =6 months postoperatively. Minimum, average, and maximum non-flutter HRs were obtained from outpatient ambulatory 24 h ECG (Holter) recordings and graded exercise tests. Chronotropic competence was assessed using percentage of age-specific predicted maximum HR achieved, and calculated chronotropic index. Effects of rate-adaptive programming and maximum atrial pacing rates were analysed in 19 permanently paced cases. Least square estimates of minimum HRs were similar in cases and controls (54+/-2 vs. 52+/-2 bpm). Average HRs were lower in cases (75+/-2 vs. 81+/-2 bpm, P=0.02). Cases and controls differed most significantly with respect to percentage of predicted maximum HR achieved (67+/-2 vs. 80+/-2%, P < 0.001). This difference remained highly significant when the data were adjusted for age, sex, permanent pacing, and negatively chronotropic medication usage at the time of testing. Among paced patients, atrial flutter was significantly less likely to be observed in the setting of rate-adaptive pacing [odds ratio (OR) = 0.36; P < 0.05], and the likelihood of detecting atrial flutter decreased relative to the maximum programmed atrial pacing rate (OR 0.87 for every 5% increment in maximum pacing rate relative to maximum predicted HR for age; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Late postoperative atrial flutter is associated with chronotropic incompetence in paediatric CHD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207