MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118299395 · doi:10.1105/tpc.114.123950

<i>Arabidopsis</i> Phytochrome A Directly Targets Numerous Promoters for Individualized Modulation of Genes in a Wide Range of Pathways

2014· article· en· W2118299395 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Chen, Bosheng Li, Gang Li, Jean‐Benoît Charron, Mingqiu Dai, Xiarong Shi, Xing Wang Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Cell · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthYale University
KeywordsPromoterBiologyPhytochrome APhytochromeTranscription factorChromatin immunoprecipitationArabidopsisAbscisic acidGeneGeneticsTranscription (linguistics)Cell biologyRNA polymerase IIGene expressionMutantBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The far-red light (FR) photoreceptor phytochrome A (phyA) contains no DNA binding domain but associates with the CHALCONE SYNTHASE promoter through its chaperone FAR-RED ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL1 and transcription factors. Here, we performed a genome-wide identification of phyA targets using a combination of phyA chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing methods in Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results indicate that phyA signaling widely affects gene promoters involved in multiple FR-modulated aspects of plant growth. Furthermore, we observed an enrichment of hormone- and stress-responsive elements in the phyA direct target promoters, indicating that a much broader than expected range of transcription factors is involved in the phyA signaling pathway. To verify our hypothesis that phyA regulates genes other than light-responsive ones through the interaction with corresponding transcription factors, we examined the action of phyA on one of its direct target genes, NAC019, which encodes an abscisic acid-dependent transcription factor. The phyA signaling cascade not only targets two G-boxes on the NAC019 promoter for subsequent transcriptional regulation but also positively coordinates with the abscisic acid signaling response for root elongation inhibition under FR. Our study provides new insight into how plants rapidly fine-tune their growth strategy upon changes in the light environment by escorting photoreceptors to the promoters of hormone- or stress-responsive genes for individualized modulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant CellSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207