Molecular and functional characterization of<i>Brassica BREVIPEDICELLUS</i>orthologs involved in inflorescence architectureThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue from the National Research Council of Canada – Plant Biotechnology Institute.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diversity of inflorescence architecture in angiosperms relates to attracting pollinators and allowing the effective dispersal of seeds. Molecular understanding of the genetic factors regulating inflorescence architecture from the model system of Arabidopsis could provide critical insights for addressing this developmental process/pathway in a closely related crop species like Brassica napus L. Towards this objective, we have isolated and characterized the orthologs of the homeobox gene BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP) in three Brassica species, B. napus (BnBP), Brassica rapa L. (BrBP), and Brassica oleracea L. (BoBP). These Brassica orthologs show a high degree of conservation at the nucleotide and amino acid level, including the homeodomain and the intron positions. The B. napus ortholog complemented the Arabidopsis bp null allele and overexpression of BnBP in B. napus transgenic lines resulted in altered leaf phenotypes. Together, these results suggest that Brassica BP genes are functional orthologs of Arabidopsis BP. Ectopic expression of AS2, a negative regulator of BP encoding a LOB domain transcription factor, in transgenic B. napus produced compact inflorescence architecture reminiscent of the loss-of-function bp mutant phenotype described previously in Arabidopsis. These results provide evidence in support of BP as a potential target gene for modifying inflorescence architecture in Brassica crop species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".