Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are delighted to have a new look journal from 2005. However, the new cover is not the only change; we have more pages and a new layout. I would like to thank the Editorial Board of AOTJ, Katrina Lok (Production Editor) and also designers from Blackwell Publishing who have worked together to develop and produce these new designs and changes. When you look at the new layout inside the journal, you will see many differences. We were aiming to increase the number of words per page so that we can publish more articles per issue and volume. This has been achieved without making the font too small to read. We have also reduced the size of the headings and the top and bottom margins. The position of the abstract and author details has changed, as well as the style of font for the headings and subheadings; all these innovations have saved space. The cover design continues to use the official OT AUSTRALIA colours; we aim to maintain the clarity and accuracy of these colours in the production process. We wanted to have a simple design, which would promote the profession and also stand out on library and occupational therapy department displays. We have the OT AUSTRALIA logo featured as a watermark on the front cover, with the full logo on the back cover. The contents list of the journal issue is maintained on the back cover for easy access. Finally, we have more pages. I wish to thank the Council of OT AUSTRALIA for supporting the Journal's application for more pages per volume. The number of pages has increased from 56 to 92 per issue from 224 to 368 pages per year or volume. This can also be interpreted as an increase of approximately 14 additional manuscripts published per year, which will enable the backlog of manuscripts to be cleared more rapidly. In addition, we will maintain the OnlineEarly facility whereby manuscripts that have been accepted and are ready for publication are published as soon as possible online, prior to allocation in the print version of the journal. It is important to understand that these articles can be cited and used, as they are in fact officially published with a DOI reference number. More details about OnlineEarly are available on the website http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/aot. When visiting the website, go to the page that lists the issues, click the OnlineEarly logo and then read the article ‘What is OnlineEarly?’ All articles published online are complete and searchable articles in HTML, with active links, and there is a PDF with journal-style formatted pages for download if that is preferred. In the HTML online version, you can click on highlighted references that will take you through the links to the reference details and then either to Crossref, Medline or the ISI Abstract. In some cases, you can link right through to the full text reference. I have written in detail about the online facility because it is important for members to try it out and use it! If you have forgotten your pin number, there is a section on the website where you can email Blackwell Publishing so that you can be issued with a new number. While in Canada during late 2004, I received many compliments about our Journal and the many recent innovations — particularly the Critically Appraised Papers section and the online facility, including OnlineEarly. I thank the Journal Board and OT AUSTRALIA for their support of these innovations — we are truly becoming a more international publication. The extra page allocation has enabled the publication of a wide variety of articles in this issue; we hope that the breadth of topics will mean that most readers will find something of interest in their specialty. In addition to the regular departments we have also been able to include a review article on occupational therapy off-road driver assessment tools and a very interesting paediatric case study. We anticipate that we will overcome the backlog of manuscripts during the year and therefore encourage you to submit your research and other articles so we can maintain the variety and high standard of our journal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".