MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Chk1/Cdc25A Pathway as Activators of the Cell Cycle in Neuronal Death Induced by Camptothecin

2006· article· en· W2118471029 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Zhang, Dianbo Qu, Erick J. Morris, Michael J. O’Hare, Steven Callaghan, Ruth S. Slack, Herbert M. Geller, David S. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Stroke NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCDC25ACell biologyCyclin-dependent kinaseBiologyCell cycleDNA damageCyclin ACyclin-dependent kinase 2Programmed cell deathCHEK1Cell cycle checkpointKinaseProtein kinase ACellBiochemistryApoptosisDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell cycle regulators appear to play a paradoxical role in neuronal death. We have shown previously that cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), along with their downstream effectors, Rb (retinoblastoma) and E2F/DP1 (E2 promoter binding factor/deleted in polyposis 1), regulate neuronal death evoked by the DNA damaging agent camptothecin. However, the mechanism by which CDKs are activated in this model is unclear. The cell division cycle 25A (Cdc25A) phosphatase is a critical regulator of cell cycle CDKs in proliferating cells. In cortical neurons, we presently show that expression of Cdc25A promotes death even in the absence of DNA damage. Importantly, Cdc25A activity is rapidly increased during DNA damage treatment. Inhibition of Cdc25A blocks death and reduces cyclin D1-associated kinase activity and Rb phosphorylation. This indicates that endogenous Cdc25A activity is important for regulation of cell cycle-mediated neuronal death. We also examined how Cdc25A activity is regulated after DNA damage. Cultured embryonic cortical neurons have a significant basal activity of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), a kinase that regulates cell cycle arrest. During camptothecin treatment of neurons, this activity is rapidly downregulated with a concomitant increase in Cdc25A activity. Importantly, expression of wild-type Chk1, but not kinase-dead Chk1, inhibits the camptothecin-induced increase in Cdc25A activity. In addition, Chk1 expression also promotes survival in the presence of the DNA-damaging agent. Together, our data suggest that a Chk1/Cdc25A activity participates in activation of a cell cycle pathway-mediated death signal in neurons. These data also define how a proliferative signal may be abnormally activated in a postmitotic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207