MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118500422 · doi:10.1037/a0030394

Quebec psychologists and continuing education.

2012· article· en· W2118500422 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stacy Bradley, Martin Drapeau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyContinuing educationApplied psychologyMedical educationPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuing education is an integral ingredient in the maintenance and development of essential competencies in professional psychology. However, there is a lack of knowledge and investigation into the continuing education practices, needs, interests, attitudes, and modality preferences among practicing psychologists, particularly those practicing in Canada. Essential aspects of continuing education among a sample of 418 licensed psychologists in clinical practice in Quebec were examined. Professional reading, case discussion groups, and private courses and workshops were the most frequently used continuing education activities. In terms of continuing education needs, related to intervention and assessments were rated most frequently, and information pertaining to adult psychopathologies, assessment of mental illness, comorbidity, and medication were the most highly rated continuing education interests. Preferred modalities for continuing education include those that are offered by psychology associations and those offered by the local regulatory body (Ordre des Psychologues du Quebec). Findings are discussed in the context of their value to psychology licensing and regulatory boards.Keywords: continuing education, psychologists, psychology, training, interestsContinued professional education is engrained in the fabric of virtually all helping professions, including medicine, social work, psychiatry, nursing, and psychology. In the behavioural health fields, continuing education is classified as a second wave of education, that of the postlicensing phase, and is geared toward refinement of existing clinical skills, mastery of changes in the knowledge base and clinical techniques, and development of new skills (Daniels & Walter, 2002, p. 360). Despite the fact that continuing education and sustained competence have been topics of concern in the psychology research and clinical communities for close to 40 years (Brown & Briley, 1979; Daniels & Walter, 2002; Katahn, 1970; Jensen, 1979; Jones, 1975; Lewinsohn, & Pearlman, 1972; Neimeyer, Taylor, & Wear, 2009; Ross, 1974; VandeCreek, Knapp, & Brace, 1990), and is rooted in both the American Psychological Association's (2002) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and of Conduct and the Canadian Psychological Association's (2001) Code of Ethics for Psychologists, there has been criticism of its delayed evolution and lack of research investigating continuing education practices, attitudes, and translation into competent clinical practice (Daniels & Walter, 2002; Neimeyer et al., 2009). Although mandatory continuing education credits are now a requirement for licensure renewal in many jurisdictions, this process has developed at a much slower pace in psychology than in other professions (VandeCreek et al., 1990). In Canada, despite continuing education being an important topic within professional psychology, as evidenced in provincial codes of ethics (e.g., the of Ethics of the Ordre des Psychologues du Quebec, Article 39; Ordre des Psychologues du Quebec, 2001), mandatory continuing education credits are not required in many of the provinces, and there is a lack of research and documentation of continuing education practices among Canadian psychologists. The current era of ever-expanding technology, clinical techniques, theoretical models, client concerns, and research into evidencebased practices (Hunsley, Dobson, Johnston, & Mikail, 1999) only intensifies and highlights the responsibility that practicing clinicians, as well as their licensing bodies, have in ensuring psychologists are up-to-date in terms of their competencies.Preferences in Continuing EducationEarly research investigating preferences in continuing education participation reveals that the most preferred or valued continuing education activities include professional reading (e.g., reading journal articles or books; Allen, Nelson, & Sheckley, 1987; Brown, Leichtman, Blass, & Fleisher, 1982; Donohoe, Atkinson, Scott, & Lemoine, 1985; McNamara, 1977; Morrow-Bradley & Elliott, 1986), supervision (receiving feedback on cases) or contact with other professionals (e. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207