MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D Visualization of the Glomerulus within Kidney Tissue made Transparent through Passive Optical Clearing

2015· article· en· W2118584529 on OpenAlexaff
Tristan Conciatori, Martin Sandig, Alexandria De Santis‐Smith, Kem A. Rogers, Brian L. Allman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearanceOptical sectioningKidneyGlomerulusPathologyConfocal microscopyVisualizationBiomedical engineeringConfocalMicroscopyAnatomyChemistryBiologyCell biologyComputer scienceMedicineOpticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The understanding of structure/function relationships in complex cellular systems is enhanced by 3D visualization of their organization at microscopic resolution. Primarily for e-learning purposes, we recently used Amira 5.1 software to develop a digital 3D model of the renal corpuscle derived from serial histologically stained semi-thin sections. Since this technique is labour-intensive and time-consuming, in this study we applied the optical clearing method CLARITY to render kidney tissue optically transparent for 3D visualization of specific structures within the renal corpuscle by immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy. Mouse kidneys were infused with a hydrogel solution to fix and cross-link protein. Cortical kidney tissue was then cut into 1mm thick sections and passively cleared for 40 days in clearing solution. The resultant optically transparent tissue was labelled for 4 days with primary antibodies against podocyte specific antigens such as nephrin, a transmembrane protein of the slit diaphragm, followed by incubation for 4 days with fluorescent secondary antibodies. 3D visualization by confocal microscopy provides detailed morphological information of the filtration barrier in the kidney glomerulus. High-resolution 3D imaging of complex cellular structures using passive optical clearing methods thus may prove useful for histology education and in histopathological inquiries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207