Microsatellite marker analysis of an anther-derived potato family: skewed segregation and genecentromere mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segregation patterns of polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) primer pairs were investigated in monoploid potato families derived from anther culture. A total of 14 primers developed from the sequences in the database, as well as from a genomic library of potato, was used. Distorted segregation was observed for seven (50%) polymorphic loci among monoploids derived from an interspecific hybrid. Similar distortion was observed for only one of five loci that could be contrasted between the two monoploid families. Segregation distortion was less common in the sexually derived backcross population between the interspecific hybrid and either of its parents. One locus could be putatively linked to a lethal allele because it showed distorted segregation in both monoploid families, a group of 70 heterozygous diploids derived from unreduced gametes through anther culture, and a backcross population. These diploids were used to map the polymorphic SSR markers with respect to the centromeres using half-tetrad analysis. The majority of the SSR loci mapped more than 33 cM from the centromere, suggesting the occurrence of a single crossover per chromosome arm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".