Expression of the protein chaperone, clusterin, in spinal cord cells constitutively and following cellular stress, and upregulation by treatment with Hsp90 inhibitor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clusterin, a protein chaperone found at high levels in physiological fluids, is expressed in nervous tissue and upregulated in several neurological diseases. To assess relevance to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other motor neuron disorders, clusterin expression was evaluated using long-term dissociated cultures of murine spinal cord and SOD1(G93A) transgenic mice, a model of familial ALS. Motor neurons and astrocytes constitutively expressed nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of clusterin, and secreted clusterin accumulated in culture media. Although clusterin can be stress inducible, heat shock failed to increase levels in these neural cell compartments despite robust upregulation of stress-inducible Hsp70 (HspA1) in non-neuronal cells. In common with HSPs, clusterin was upregulated by treatment with the Hsp90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, and thus could contribute to the neuroprotection previously identified for such compounds in disease models. Clusterin expression was not altered in cultured motor neurons expressing SOD1(G93A) by gene transfer or in presymptomatic SOD1(G93A) transgenic mice; however, clusterin immunolabeling was weakly increased in lumbar spinal cord of overtly symptomatic mice. More striking, mutant SOD1 inclusions, a pathological hallmark, were strongly labeled by anti-clusterin. Since secreted, as well as intracellular, mutant SOD1 contributes to toxicity, the extracellular chaperoning property of clusterin could be important for folding and clearance of SOD1 and other misfolded proteins in the extracellular space. Evaluation of chaperone-based therapies should include evaluation of clusterin as well as HSPs, using experimental models that replicate the control mechanisms operant in the cells and tissue of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".