MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118650636 · doi:10.1269/jrr.42.217

Effect of a Hypoxic Radiosensitizer, AK 2123 (Sanazole), on Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2001· article· en· W2118650636 on OpenAlexaff
K. Pasupathy, Cherupally Krishnan Krishnan Nair, Tsutomu Kagiya

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Radiation Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeYeastSensitizationChemistryIonizing radiationRadiosensitizerDNA repairDNA damageDNAHomologous recombinationRAD52MutantWild typeAnaerobic exerciseBiochemistryCell biologyBiophysicsIrradiationBiologyMedicineRadiation therapyRAD51ImmunologyGenePhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sanazole/DNA repair/Hypoxic radiosensitization/DNA polymerases/Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can exist in two physiological states, namely anaerobic and aerobic. They differ in their response to gamma- radiation and radiomodification. We report hereon our results concerning radiosensitization by Sanazole (AK-2123), a well-known hypoxic radio sensitizer, whose mechanism of action has been studied extensively. The results have revealed that Sanazole (1 mM) when present during irradiation could specifically sensitize wild-type anaerobic yeast cells with a DMF of 2.4. In a radiation-sensitive mutant which lacks a DNA repair pathway specific for the recovery from gamma-radiation induced DNA damage, the extent of sensitization was considerably lower and the DMF was only 1.3. Studies on the liquid holding recovery of cells of both wild- type and rad52 yeast cells exposed to radiation in presence of Sanazole revealed that sensitization by Sanazole is due to a preferential increase in the DNA damage, and not by impairing DNA repair. This system thus holds promise for screening potential hypoxic chemical radiosensitizers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Radiation ResearchSame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207