MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118672597 · doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1315

Spatial pattern and patchiness during ontogeny: post-settled Gadus morhua from coastal Newfoundland

2003· article· en· W2118672597 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David A. Methven

Bibliographic record

VenueICES Journal of Marine Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsGadusBenthic zoneSpatial distributionFjordJuvenile fishEnvironmental scienceHabitatSpatial ecologyOceanographyFisheryEcologyAtlantic codBiologyGeographyJuvenileFish <Actinopterygii>Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested the hypothesis that patchiness increases after settlement to the bottom in a marine broadcast spawner, the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua . Patchiness P=1+1/k was estimated from the dispersion parameter k of the negative binomial distribution. Estimates were based on length frequency distributions of fish from 18–330 mm that were seined from shallow nursery areas (<10 m depth) during autumn. Patchiness was highest for small cod (<24 mm) in the process of settling to benthic or epibenthic habitats. Settling cod were only collected from coastal sites located in deep fjords where adults overwinter and spawn. Patchiness was lowest for fish newly settled to benthic habitats (c. 50 mm SL) and increased thereafter with length to 200 mm SL. Our analyses suggest that patchiness in G. morhua > 200 mm depends on a shifting balance between establishment of home ranges (tending to reduce patchiness) and schooling behaviour (tending to increase patchiness). Patchiness generally increased for G. morhua between 25–200 mm SL when examined at different spatial (major bays along the northeast coast of Newfoundland) and temporal (years) scales suggesting processes responsible for these patterns may be consistent among the bays and years examined. Our results show that more is learned about the distribution of fish by examining the zeroth, first, and second moments (presence/absence, mean abundance and patchiness) than by examining only one measure. We hypothesize that patchiness continues to increase for larger juvenile and adult G. morhua that were not examined in this study. We propose that patchiness may then decrease for the very largest cod, “mother fish” that may not undergo extensive annual spawning migrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICES Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207