Genetic control of broad-spectrum resistance to turnip mosaic virus in Brassica rapa (Chinese cabbage)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Brassica rapa line RLR22 was resistant to eight diverse turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) isolates. A B. rapa genetic map based on 213 marker loci segregating in 120 first back-cross (B(1)) individuals was established and aligned with the B. rapa genome reference map using some of the RFLP probes. B(1) individuals were self-pollinated to produce B(1)S(1) families. The existence of two loci controlling resistance to TuMV isolate CDN 1 was established from contrasting patterns of segregation for resistance and susceptibility in the B(1)S(1) families. The first gene, recessive TuMV resistance 01 (retr01), had a recessive allele for resistance, was located on the upper portion of chromosome R4 and was epistatic to the second gene. The second gene, Conditional TuMV resistance 01 (ConTR01), possessed a dominant allele for resistance and was located on the upper portion of chromosome R8. These genes also controlled resistance to TuMV isolate CZE 1 and might be sufficient to explain the broad-spectrum resistance of RLR22. The dominant resistance gene, ConTR01, was coincident with one of the three eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) loci of B. rapa and possibly one of the loci of eIF(iso)4E. The recessive resistance gene retr01 was apparently coincident with one of the three loci of eIF(iso)4E in the A genome of Brassica napus and therefore, by inference, in the B. rapa genome. This suggested a mode of action for the resistance that is based on denying the viral RNA access to the translation initiation complex of the plant host. The gene retr01 is the first reported example of a recessive resistance gene mapped in a Brassica species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".