IFN-γ Expressed by T Cells Regulates the Persistence of Antigen Presentation by Limiting the Survival of Dendritic Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ag presentation to T cells orchestrates the development of acquired immune response. Although it is considered that Ag presentation may persist at high levels during chronic infections, we have previously reported that in mice infected with bacillus Calmette-Guérin, Ag presentation gets drastically curtailed during the chronic stage of infection despite antigenic persistence. In this report we evaluated the mechanism of this curtailment. Ag presentation declined precipitously as the T cell response developed, and Ag presentation was not curtailed in mice that were deficient in CD8(+) T cells or MHC class II, suggesting that T cells regulate Ag presentation. Curtailment of Ag presentation was reduced in IFN-gamma-deficient mice, but not in mice with a deficiency/mutation in inducible NOS2, perforin, or Fas ligand. In hosts with no T cells (Rag1(-/-)), Ag presentation was not curtailed during the chronic stage of infection. However, adoptive transfer of wild-type, but not IFN-gamma(-/-), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells into Rag1-deficient hosts strongly curtailed Ag presentation. Increased persistence of Ag presentation in IFN-gamma-deficient hosts correlated to increased survival of dendritic cells, but not of macrophages, and was not due to increased stimulatory capacity of IFN-gamma-deficient dendritic cells. These results reveal a novel mechanism indicating how IFN-gamma prevents the persistence of Ag presentation, thereby preventing memory T cells from going into exhaustion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".