Evaluation of Polymorphic Splicing in the Mechanism of the Association of the Insulin Gene With Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The association of type 1 diabetes with the insulin gene (IDDM2 locus) has been mapped to a short haplotype encompassing two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in perfect linkage disequilibrium (r(2) = 1) with each other and with the two allele classes at the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism upstream of the transcription site. Although it is believed that the genetic effect is mediated through transcriptional effects of the VNTR, an alternative mechanism has been recently proposed: In transfected cells, the common A allele at one of the SNPs (-23A-->T, in relation to the translation-initiation codon) weakens the splicing of intron 1, resulting in a minor ( approximately 15% of total RNA) transcript with a longer 5' untranslated region and sixfold enhanced translational efficiency. The purpose of our study was to confirm these findings in RNA from normal human pancreas and thymus. We report that pancreas does contain the alternative transcript in an allele-dependent manner but at a very low proportion (<5% of total INS mRNA). We believe that this level would have a minor, if any, biological effect involved in the mechanism of the IDDM2 locus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".