Trophic structure of nematode communities, microbial biomass, and nitrogen mineralization in soils of forests and clearcuts in the southern interior of British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The trophic structure of nematode communities, lengths of fungal hyphae, and gross populations of protozoa and bacteria were compared between clearcuts and adjacent forests at three sites in the southern interior of British Columbia in 1996, 1997, and 1998. Total C and N, mineralizable N (anaerobic incubation), and N mineralised during aerobic incubations, were determined from the same soil samples used for biological assays. Net N mineralization did not differ between clearcuts and forests in 1997; in 1998 net N mineralization in the organic horizon was four times greater for forests than for clearcuts. Hyphal lengths and total microbial biomass were greater in forest soil than in clearcut soil. Bacterial abundance was greater in forest soil than in clearcut soil in 1996 only. The abundance of protozoa did not differ between clearcuts and forests. Fungivorous, omnivorous, and predacious nematodes were less abundant in clearcut soil than in forest soil. Bacterivorous nematodes were more abundant in the mineral soil of clearcuts than in forests in 1996, but did not differ between clearcuts and forests in any other combination of year and horizon. Net N mineralization was correlated with the ratio of bacterial biomass/fungal biomass (r = 0.72, 12 degrees of freedom), as well as the abundance of amoebae (r = 0.83), total nematodes (r = 0.80), bacterivorous nematodes (r = 0.74), and fungivorous nematodes (r = 0.83). Key words: Microfauna, nematode ecology, microbial biomass, clearcut harvesting, nitrogen mineralization
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".