Uric Acid Levels Have No Significant Effect on Renal Function in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Uric acid (UA) has been linked to renal damage in experimental models of kidney failure. In humans, no definitive link between UA and renal function has been established, but several epidemiologic studies have suggested that higher UA levels are associated with accelerated loss of renal function, higher incidence of dialysis, and death. Many of the associations have been limited by the colinearity between UA levels and renal function. Renal transplantation is no exception, and limited information is available concerning the independent role of UA on progression of renal function in transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We investigated the association between UA and renal function progression during the first 3 yr after transplantation, adjusted for baseline renal function, in 1645 patients who were enrolled in the Symphony study. RESULTS: When corrected for baseline renal function, UA levels 1 mo after transplantation were not associated with 3-yr renal function (P = 0.62). There was a strong colinearity between calculated renal function and UA levels 1 mo after transplantation. In fact, when not corrected for baseline renal function, there was a significant association between UA and renal function at 3 yr (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Low renal function is associated with higher UA levels, but higher UA levels are not independently associated with progression of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".