MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118915943 · doi:10.1128/jcm.01049-06

FDJS03 Isolates Causing an Outbreak of Aseptic Meningitis in China That Evolved from a Distinct Echovirus 30 Lineage Imported from Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States

2006· article· en· W2118915943 on OpenAlexaff
Ya Nan Zhao, David S. Perlin, Steven Park, Ren Jie Jiang, Liang Chen, Yue Chen, Rebecca Gardiner, Qingwu Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsEchovirusPhylogenetic treeBiologyOutbreakAseptic meningitisVirologyGenomeLineage (genetic)EnterovirusGeneticsSerotypePhylogeneticsGeneStrain (injury)Virus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compared echovirus 30 strains (FDJS03) which caused an outbreak of aseptic meningitis in China in 2003 with other human enterovirus B strains. Sequencing of the complete genome of FDJS03_84, a representative strain from this outbreak, revealed a mosaic structure with a putative recombination spot within the 2B gene. It was most similar to a strain of the same serotype, E30-14125-00, in the 5' half of the genome but was almost equidistant to all strains analyzed in most of the 3' half of the genome. Phylogenetic relationships in the 5'-untranslated region and the VP1 gene indicated that the FDJS03 isolates were closely related to a distinct lineage of E30 which circulated in countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States during 1999 and 2000. It is most likely that the ancestor of FDJS03 isolates experienced multiple recombination events in the nonstructural protein coding region, which were partly observed in the phylogenetic analysis of the 3D region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207