Preliminary Study on Differentiation of <i>Leptospira Grippotyphosa</i> and <i>Leptospira Sejroe</i> from Other Common Pathogenic Leptospiral Serovars in Canine Urine by Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using primer sets of G1/G2 and B64-I/B64-II was validated to detect pathogenic leptospira serovars from canine urine samples. The PCR method was found to be specific and sensitive with a detection limit of 100 cells of Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae per milliliter of urine. The primer set previously designated and erroneously transcribed B64-I/B64-II amplified a DNA fragment of 352 base pairs from Leptospira grippotyphosa and Leptospira sejroe but not from Leptospira autumnalis, Leptospira bratislava, Leptospira canicola, Leptospira hardjo, Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae, and Leptospira pomona. From 100 diagnostic canine urine samples, 5 were found positive for Leptospira grippotyphosalsejroe with a PCR product of 352 base pairs and 6 were positive for other pathogenic leptospira serovars with a PCR product of 285 base pairs. One 285-base pair product was sequenced and found to be 99.3% homologous to the G1/G2 PCR fragment sequence reported previously. All 352-base pair PCR products of clinical samples and pure cultures of L. grippotyphosa and L. sejroe were sequenced. The 352-base pair fragment sequences of L. grippotyphosa and L sejroe were identical. Only 2 base pairs were found different between the sequences from pure cultures and those from clinical samples. Serum samples from 3 positive cases that generated a PCR product of 352 base pairs were tested by the microscopic agglutination test, and 2 were found to be positive for L. grippotyphosa (1:10,240 and 1:5,120), 1 was positive for L. grippotyphosa (1:320) or L. icterohaemorrhagiae (1:320). The results of this study suggest that the multiplex PCR with the primer set G1/G2 and the erroneously transcribed B64-I/B64-II may be able to differentiate L. grippotyphosa or L. sejroe from other pathogenic leptospira serovars commonly tested for in Canadian diagnostic laboratories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".