Wat Phra Dhammakaya: Models of Network Management for the Stability of Thai Society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative research was to study 1) the historical background establishment of Wat Phra Dhammakaya network in Thai society, 2) the current circumstances and problems of Wat Phra Dhammakaya network management in Thai society, and 3) the models of network management for the stability of Thai society. Fieldwork data and documents collected using a survey, observations, interviews, and focus-group discussions. Sixty informants were selected from Chiang Mai, Nakhon Ratchasima, and Prachin Buri Provinces. It was found that Wat Phra Dhammakaya network was established during 1986-2012 due to faith in teaching of Dhammakaya Enlightenment. The existing situation and problems were organization management, personnel administration, seeking resources, assistance, public relations, and team work. Network management models for stability of Thai society included governance, promotion of education, propagation, and infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".