Angiogenesis Inhibitor IM862 Is Ineffective Against AIDS-Kaposi's Sarcoma in a Phase III Trial, but Demonstrates Sustained, Potent Effect of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: From the AIDS Malignancy Consortium and IM862 Study Team
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: IM862 is a synthetic dipeptide (L-glutamine L-tryptophan) with in vitro and in vivo antiangiogenic properties. Phase I/II studies showed minimal toxicity and a response rate of 36% in AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma. We report a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial with the phase II dose, 5 mg intranasally every other day. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two HIV-positive patients were enrolled, 104 on IM862 and 98 on placebo. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable except current antiretroviral therapy: 88% versus 96% (IM862 v placebo group; P = .042). The median treatment durations were 19.5 versus 24 weeks (IM862 v placebo). No significant difference was detected in response rate (IM862, 23%; 95% CI, 15% to 32% v placebo, 21%; 95% CI, 14% to 31%; P = .46), time to response (8.5 weeks v 14 weeks; P = .024), or duration of response. However, IM862 was associated with both a shorter time to response (8.5 weeks v 14 weeks; P = .024) and shorter median time to progression (16 weeks, 95% CI, 13 to 27 weeks v 35 weeks, 95% CI, 26 to 114 weeks; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Despite promising phase I and phase II studies, IM862 5 mg every other day was not superior to placebo and may accelerate time to progression. Highly active antiretroviral therapy alone was associated with a substantial rate of sustained tumor response and may have contributed to prior estimates of IM862 response. Therapeutic trials for AIDS-Kaposi's sarcoma must account for ongoing immune reconstitution in the setting of concurrent highly active antiretroviral therapy that may confound estimates of therapeutic activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".