MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119166222 · doi:10.2216/10-94.1

Algae and stomatocysts associated with carnivorous plants. First report of chrysophyte stomatocysts from Virginia, USA

2011· article· en· W2119166222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Konrad Wołowski, Jolanta Pia̧tek, Bartosz J. Płachno

Bibliographic record

VenuePhycologia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarnivorous plantBiologyAlgaeTaxonEcologyBotanyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractWołowski K., Piątek J. and Płachno B.J. 2011. Algae and stomatocysts associated with carnivorous plants. First report of chrysophyte stomatocysts from Virginia, USA. Phycologia 50: 511–519. DOI: 10.2216/10-94.1This paper includes data about chrysophyte stomatocysts and algae occurring together with carnivorous plants (Utricularia and Aldrovanda). In the examined material from Fredericksburg Turnpike, Woodford, Virginia, USA, among various groups of algae 12 different morphotypes of chrysophyte stomatocysts were found. Seven of the stomatocysts are reported for the first time from Virginia (stomatocysts 42, 57, 86, 135, 150, 228 and 234). Furthermore, two morphotypes are new to the USA (stomatocysts 142 and 214), and two morphotypes are described as new to science (stomatocysts 2 and 3). The new morphotypes were described on the basis of 11 and five specimens, respectively. All reported morphotypes are briefly described and illustrated using scanning electron microscopy. The list of algal taxa occurring together with stomatocysts and inside the traps of Utricularia purpurea is also presented.Key Words:: AlgaeAquatic carnivorous plantsChrysophyte stomatocystsMorphotypesSEMStomatocyst morphologyUtricularia purpurea ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSBJP is grateful for support from the Foundation for Polish Sciences (Start Programme) and Prof. Douglas Darnowski (Indiana University Southeast) for his hospitality. The stay of BJP in the USA was financed by a grant to DWD from the Indiana University/Indiana University Southeast Large Grant Program). We are also grateful to the Philip M. Sheridan (Meadowview Biological Research Station, Virginia, USA) for hosting and supporting BJP to study algae and carnivorous plants at Meadowview Biological Research Station. We thank Dr. Marcin Piątek (W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Kraków, Poland) for checking some cyst identifications and improvement of the first version of the manuscript and to James M. Ehrman (Mount Alison University, New Brunswick Canada) for polishing the English version of this work. The work was carried out within the scientific project No. N 304 220135 supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhycologiaSame topicPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesFrench-language works237,207