MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119200850 · doi:10.1177/2325967115s00084

Pre-Operative Femoral Nerve Block for Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015· article· en· W2119200850 on OpenAlexaff
Jerry G. Xing, Faraj W. Abdallah, Stephanie Oldfield, Andrew P. Dold, M. Lucas Murnaghan, Richard Brull, Daniel B. Whelan

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaHip arthroscopyBupivacaineSurgeryFemoral nerveRandomized controlled trialPostoperative nausea and vomitingPlaceboNerve blockProspective cohort studyBody mass indexArthroscopyNausea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: : Arthroscopy has become a standard method of treatment for a variety of intra-articular hip pathologies. While most arthroscopic hip procedures are performed as day-surgeries, patients can still experience significant post-operative pain and opioid-associated side-effects. Our group has shown the potential benefits of preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) in a previous retrospective review. It was our objective to confirm these findings in a prospective study. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included in this prospective, single centre, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. All patients received a pre-operative ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with either 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (treatment group, n=27) or normal saline (control group, n=23). Nerve blockade was confirmed via standardized sensory testing prior to the induction of general anaesthesia. Groups were compared with respect to patient sex, age, body mass index (BMI), physical status classification according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA); procedure performed; and opioid requirements. The primary endpoint was total oral morphine equivalent consumption in 24 hours. Secondary endpoints included visual analog pain scores; Quality of Recovery (QoR-27) score at 24 hours; incidence of nausea and vomiting; patient satisfaction; and block-related complications. Results: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to sex, age, weight, height, BMI, ASA classification, or type of procedures performed. Total oral morphine consumption at 24 hours was similar between groups. Patient-reported pain scores were lower at all times points in the femoral nerve block group compared to the placebo group with statistical significance reached at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, 4 hour, and 6 hours post-operatively. There was no difference in the rates of nausea and vomiting after surgery, Quality of Recovery score at 24 hours, time to discharge, or symptoms of itching, weakness, and injection site bruising and pain. The placebo group had a significantly higher rate of reported constipation at 48 hours. 6 out of 27 patients in the femoral nerve block reported falls (without injury) at 24 hours compared to 0 out of 23 patients in the placebo group. The satisfaction score, however, was similarly high in both groups at all time-points. Conclusion: Pre-operatively administered femoral nerve blocks lead to decreased pain scores in the early post-operative phase without affecting opioid consumption or opioid-related side effects. Patient satisfaction with pain control was similarly high between groups. Given the rate of falls observed in this study, we cannot recommend the routine use of femoral nerve blocks for outpatient hip arthroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207