MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119255561 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.899180

Real-Time Vessel Segmentation and Tracking for Ultrasound Imaging Applications

2007· article· en· W2119255561 on OpenAlexaff
Julian Guerrero, Septimiu E. Salcudean, James A. McEwen, Bassam A. Masri, Savvas Nicolaou

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionEllipseSegmentationArtificial intelligenceKalman filterComputer scienceTracking (education)Feature (linguistics)Image segmentationTransverse plane3D ultrasoundUltrasoundMathematicsEngineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for vessel segmentation and tracking in ultrasound images using Kalman filters is presented. A modified Star-Kalman algorithm is used to determine vessel contours and ellipse parameters using an extended Kalman filter with an elliptical model. The parameters can be used to easily calculate the transverse vessel area which is of clinical use. A temporal Kalman filter is used for tracking the vessel center over several frames, using location measurements from a handheld sensorized ultrasound probe. The segmentation and tracking have been implemented in real-time and validated using simulated ultrasound data with known features and real data, for which expert segmentation was performed. Results indicate that mean errors between segmented contours and expert tracings are on the order of 1%-2% of the maximum feature dimension, and that the transverse cross-sectional vessel area as computed from estimated ellipse parameters a, b as determined by our algorithm is within 10% of that determined by experts. The location of the vessel center was tracked accurately for a range of speeds from 1.4 to 11.2 mm/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207