MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119310929 · doi:10.1016/j.iedee.2013.03.001

What matters to store Brand Equity? An approach to Spanish large retailing in a downturn context

2013· article· es· W2119310929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrand equityContext (archaeology)AdvertisingRecessionBusinessEquity (law)MarketingEconomicsGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Store brands account for 41% of the Spanish market share in 2011, and a further increase is expected in next years due to economic crisis, which makes up an increasingly competitive market with great research interest. In this context, our study aims to analyze which variables have a relevant influence on store Brand Equity from the consumers’ standpoint in the current downturn context, providing an empirical research on the Spanish large retailing. We carried out an on-line questionnaire to customers of store brands residing in Spain, obtaining a total amount of 362 valid responses regarding the Spanish large retailers Mercadona, Dia, Eroski, Carrefour and El Corte Inglés. Then, the analysis was performed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results obtained suggest that store commercial image has the higher influence on both store brand perceived quality and store brand awareness, and in relation with the sources of store Brand Equity, the dimension store brand awareness shows the greater influence on the formation of store Brand Equity. This study is of great interest for large retailers who wish to increase their store brands’ value proposition to the marketplace, especially during economic downturns. Las marcas del distribuidor suponen el 41 por ciento de la cuota de mercado em España en el año 2011, y se espera un incremento mayor en los próximos años debido a la crisis económica, lo que configura un mercado cada vez más competitivo com gran interés para la investigación. En este contexto, nuestro trabajo trata de analizar qué variables tienen una influencia relevante en el valor de las marcas del distribuidor desde el punto de vista de los consumidores en el contexto de la actual recesión económica, ofreciendo un estudio empírico para la gran distribución española. Para ello se realizó un cuestionario electrónico dirigido a los consumidores de marcas del distribuidor residentes en España, obteniendo un total de 362 respuestas válidas y considerando a los grandes distribuidores Mercadona, Dia, Eroski, Carrefour y El Corte Inglés. A continuación, se realizó un análisis empleando un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales (SEM). Los resultados obtenidos sugieren que la imagen comercial de la enseña es la variable con mayor influencia sobre la calidad percibida de la marca del distribuidor, como sobre la notoriedad de la marca del distribuidor; y en relación a las fuentes del valor de las marcas del distribuidor, la dimensión notoriedad de marca muestra la mayor influencia en la formación del valor de las marcas del distribuidor. Este trabajo es de gran interés para la gran distribución que desea incrementar la proposición de valor de sus marcas en el mercado, especialmente durante períodos de recesión económica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it