MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119347322 · doi:10.3968/5560

Analysis and Countermeasures on Product Quality Inspection Management in the Quality Management System of Research in Universities

2014· article· en· W2119347322 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhisheng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicResearch, Science, and Academia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Quality management systemQuality managementEngineering managementOrder (exchange)Computer scienceProcess managementScientific managementManagement systemQuality assuranceBusinessQuality policyEngineeringOperations managementMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the operation and practice of the scientific research quality management system in Universities, according to the standards demands on product quality inspection and the characteristics of scientific research product, the questions of scientific research product quality inspection in the quality management system in Universities were summarized. The implementation, supervision and management measures of scientific research product quality inspection were analyzed and put forward, in order to provide the reference of enhancing the operational effectiveness of scientific research quality management system and improving the research management in Universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.047
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0470.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicResearch, Science, and AcademiaFrench-language works237,207