MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectro‐temporal sound density‐dependent long‐term adaptation in cat primary auditory cortex

2008· article· en· W2119376665 on OpenAlexaff
Boris Gourévitch, Jos J. Eggermont

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neuroscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditory cortexHabituationStimulus (psychology)NeuroscienceSensory systemPsychologyStimulationSensory stimulation therapyAudiologyCognitive psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensory systems use adaptive strategies to code for the changing environment on different time scales. Short-term adaptation (up to 100 ms) reflects mostly synaptic suppression mechanisms after response to a stimulus. Long-term adaptation (up to a few seconds) is reflected in the habituation of neuronal responses to constant stimuli. Very long-term adaptation (several weeks) can lead to plastic changes in the cortex, most often facilitated during early development, by stimulus relevance or by behavioral states such as attention. In this study, we show that long-term adaptation with a time course of tens of minutes is detectable in anesthetized adult cat auditory cortex after a few minutes of listening to random-frequency tone pips. After the initial post-onset suppression, a slow recovery of the neuronal response strength to tones at or near their best frequency was observed for low-rate random sounds (four pips per octave per second) during stimulation. The firing rate at the end of stimulation (15 min) reached levels close to that observed during the initial onset response. The effect, visible for both spikes and, to a smaller extent, local field potentials, decreased with increasing spectro-temporal density of the sound. The spectro-temporal density of sound may therefore be of particular relevance in cortical processing. Our findings suggest that low stimulus rates may produce a specific acoustic environment that shapes the primary auditory cortex through very different processing than for spectro-temporally more dense and complex sounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207