MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119393553 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1349763

Correlation coefficient-based voice activity detector algorithm

2004· article· en· W2119393553 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Crăciun, M. Gabrea

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeech recognitionNoise (video)TIMITAlgorithmAutoregressive modelSpeech enhancementFilter (signal processing)Noise measurementDetectorSpeech processingBackground noiseEnergy (signal processing)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Hidden Markov modelArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionMathematicsStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A voice activity detector (VAD) is an algorithm able to distinguish the speech regions from the background noise of the input signal and is an important step in many speech processing applications. The varying nature and the large variety of speech and background noise make this problem difficult especially for low signal to noise ratio (SNR) that is the case for many practical applications. In this paper we propose a new VAD algorithm designed to improve the solution of word boundary detection problem for variable background noise level in a real time application. The input signal is windowed in time domain and then the energy and the spectrum of the current frame are obtained. The first few frames are supposed not to contain speech and are used to obtain a first estimate of the noise parameters. These parameters are updated during the silence periods using a first order autoregressive filter. In order to obtain robust parameters that do not depend on the amplitude of the spectrum, the correlation coefficient of the instantaneous spectrum and an average of the background noise spectrum is calculated. The speech regions may be detected based on a statistical approach using a simple binary Markov model for speech activity process. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method a clean speech dataset from the TIMIT database corrupted with different types of noise from NOISEX database for different SNR levels has been utilized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207