A test of absolute photorefractoriness and photo-induced neural plasticity of song-control regions in black-capped chickadees (<i>Poecile atricapillus</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We tested whether male and female black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus (L., 1766), were absolutely photorefractory according to Hamner's (1968) criteria of (i) spontaneous regression of gonads during prolonged long-day exposure and (ii) no subsequent recrudescence of gonads in response to constant light. We initially exposed black-capped chickadees to constant long-day photoperiods. Gonads regressed spontaneously, demonstrating that the birds met Hamner's first criterion for absolute photorefractoriness. Once their gonads fully regressed and the birds were in advanced prebasic moult, we exposed them to one of three photoperiods for an additional 2 weeks: constant light (24 h L), short days (8 h L), and controls (15 h L). Constant light challenge had no effect on gonadal condition or rate of moult, confirming that the birds met Hamner's second criterion for absolute refractoriness. We also compared volumes of song-control nuclei in the three groups and found that males overall had larger HVC, robust nucleus of arcopallium, and area X than females, but that longer days (24 h L) did not increase volumes and that shorter days (8 h L) did not decrease volumes compared with controls (15 h L). These data support the inference that black-capped chickadees do indeed become absolutely photorefractory, and that photorefractoriness precludes photo-induced plasticity of the song-control system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".