MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

OT1-02-13: Cardiac Biomarkers on Trastuzumab (Cabot Trial): Determining the Cardiac Biomarker Profile in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy.

2011· article· en· W2119525612 on OpenAlexaffabout
V Sunil Kumar, Peter A. Kavsak, Sara Rask, SD Mukherjee, Peter Ellis, Bindi Dhesy-Thind

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsJuravinski HospitalJuravinski Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrastuzumabMedicineCardiotoxicityInternal medicineBreast cancerEjection fractionCardiologyBiomarkerHeart failureTroponinBrain natriuretic peptideOncologyCancerNatriuretic peptideChemotherapyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Trastuzumab is a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated a 50% reduction in the risk of HER2+ breast cancer recurrence. This benefit is at the risk of possible cardiac dysfunction. Detecting trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity based on physical examination and assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by serial echocardiography or multi gated acquisition (MUGA) scan, has low diagnostic sensitivity and low predictive power in detecting subclinical myocardial injury. There is interest in developing simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective tools for early identification of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity. Use of easily detectible cardiac biomarkers in blood, such as cardiac troponins (cTnT and cTnI) and natriuretic peptides (NPs), are being evaluated. Kavsak et al. have studied a high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assay that is 10-fold more sensitive, and may be able to identify evolving injury earlier when compared to the conventional cTn assays. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been established as an indicator for heart failure. Pro-BNP is secreted from the cardiac ventricles in response to increased pressure and volume and is divided into NT-pro-BNP and BNP. The longer half-life of NT-proBNP may make it a more accurate predictor of ventricular stress. Trial design: This is a pilot single institution, prospective cohort study of 25 patients. Breast cancer patients will be seen at the Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada. Biomarkers will be collected at baseline, then days 1 and 2 of every 21 day cycle for the first 3 months, then every 42 days for the next 3 months. LVEF will be measured at baseline and then every 3 months while on trastuzumab. Eligibility criteria: Patients with stage I-III, HER2 positive (3+ by immunohistochemistry or FISH+) breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. Patients who have received prior trastuzumab therapy or are unable to provide informed consent will be excluded. Specific aims: To determine the biological profile of cardiac biomarkers — cTnT, hs-cTn, and NT-proBNP — in patients on adjuvant trastuzumab; and, to determine if elevations in these biomarkers correlate with LVEF. Statistical methods: A convenient sample size of 25 patients will be entered into this pilot study. The minimum of 20 patients is a requirement by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to formally accept existing reference ranges for the cardiac biomarkers to be used in the HER2 breast cancer population (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)). Present accrual and target accrual: 8 patients have enrolled to date. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research→French-language works237,207→