MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119588604 · doi:10.1111/eea.12110

Foliar nutrients explain goldspotted oak borer,<i><scp>A</scp>grilus auroguttatus</i>, adult feeding preference among four<scp>C</scp>alifornia oak species

2013· article· en· W2119588604 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yigen Chen, Tom W. Coleman, Michael I. Jones, Mary Louise Flint, Steven J. Seybold

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyNutrientBotanyPEST analysisFagaceaeHorticultureDry weightAnimal scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adults of the invasive goldspotted oak borer, A grilus auroguttatus S chaeffer ( C oleoptera: B uprestidae), consumed foliar weight in no‐choice feeding tests of, in descending order, C alifornia black oak Q uercus kelloggii N ewb., E ngelmann oak, Q uercus engelmannii G reene, coast live oak, Q uercus agrifolia N ée, and canyon live oak, Q uercus chrysolepis L iebm. ( F agaceae). Furthermore, significantly more foliar area was consumed of Q . kelloggii than of Q . chrysolepis . In dual‐choice feeding tests with isolated leaf disks, A . auroguttatus consumed significantly more foliar weight and area of Q . kelloggii relative to the other three oak species, and more foliar weight of Q . agrifolia than of Q . chrysolepis . In dual‐choice feeding tests with leaves on small branches, A . auroguttatus consumed more foliar weight of Q . kelloggii than of Q . engelmannii and Q . agrifolia . Thus, multiple experiments suggested that adults of A . auroguttatus preferred the foliage of Q . kelloggii over that of the other three oak species, and among the other three species they did not appear to have a strong feeding preference. Factor analysis reduced the quantities of 13 foliar nutrients into two new variables (factor 1 and factor 2). Factor 1 was weighted heavily on the quantities of nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, and copper, whereas factor 2 was weighted heavily on the quantities of zinc, iron, and aluminum. Factor 1 varied by oak species, with Q . kelloggii having a higher factor 1 nutrient content than the other three species. Factor 2 response was higher in Q . kelloggii , Q . agrifolia , and Q . engelmannii than in Q . chrysolepis . The collective effects of four macronutrients (nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and potassium) and two micronutrients (zinc and copper) suggest that these might be the nutrients directing preferential feeding of A . auroguttatus adults on the foliage of Q . kelloggii . Leaf toughness might also play an important role in feeding preference. Female A . auroguttatus did not show an ovipositional preference among the four oak species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207