MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119592564 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr013

Relationship between alcohol consumption and myocardial infarction among ageing men using a marginal structural model

2011· article· en· W2119592564 on OpenAlexaff
Jenni Ilomäki, Anjum Hajat, Jussi Kauhanen, Sudhir Kurl, Jay S. Kaufman, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Maarit Jaana Korhonen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersJuho Vainion SäätiöSuomen KulttuurirahastoAcademy of Finland
KeywordsMedicineConfoundingConfidence intervalBody mass indexHazard ratioProportional hazards modelMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between alcohol consumption and myocardial infarction (MI) have typically used baseline data on alcohol consumption and potential confounders. This study aimed at investigating the association between alcohol consumption and MI considering time-varying alcohol consumption and time-varying confounders. METHODS: Data were available for 1030 males participating in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (Finland). Baseline data for the present study were collected in 1991-93. MIs were ascertained from national registries until December 2005. Alcohol consumption was categorized into four groups. Data were analysed using conventional discrete-time hazard and marginal structural models (MSMs). Time-invariant covariates were age, working status, diabetes and cigarette-years. Time-varying covariates in the MSM were prior alcohol consumption, smoking, history of cardiovascular diseases, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, insulin and fibrinogen. RESULTS: An insignificant increase of MI risk among the heaviest alcohol consumers (≥168 g week(-1)) compared with the reference group (12-83 g week(-1)) was observed when using a conventional model including baseline alcohol consumption and confounders measured prior to baseline [relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.68-2.12]. When using a conventional model with time-varying alcohol consumption and adjusting for prior confounders, an increased risk of MI among the heaviest alcohol consumers was revealed (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.03-2.85). There was also a trend towards increased risk among the heaviest consumers using the MSM (RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.93-2.72). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that standard methods using only baseline data on alcohol consumption and confounders may lead to biased estimates on the association between alcohol consumption and MI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.459
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.049 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsFrench-language works237,207