Evidence of a role for the INK4 family of cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitors in ovarian granulosa cell tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary are relatively rare and account for <5% of all ovarian cancers. The molecular pathogenesis of these tumors is not well understood. We tested the hypothesis that cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, specifically the inhibitors of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (INK4) family, are targets for altered gene expression in GCTs. The status of RB1, INK4A, INK4B, INK4C, INK4D, and ARF in 13 adult and 2 juvenile ovarian GCTs was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of total RNA and exon-specific sequencing of genomic DNA. Tumors showing loss of INK4A expression were assayed further by exon-deletion analysis and methylation-specific PCR. None of the juvenile tumors demonstrated altered expression, but 7/12 (58%) adult GCTs lacked expression of INK4A, INK4B, or both. In one of these cases, we noted a homozygous deletion of the INK4A locus, and in the remaining tumors we found hypermethylation of the promoter region, a mechanism that can lead to gene inactivation. These data support a role for the INK4 family of CDK inhibitors in the biology of GCTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".