MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119671795 · doi:10.1139/o04-050

The FACT chromatin modulator: genetic and structure/function relationships

2004· review· en· W2119671795 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Richard A. Singer, Gerald C. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsRNA polymerase IIChromatinTranscription factor II DNucleosomeRNA polymeraseBiologyTranscription (linguistics)GeneticsCell biologyRNA polymerase II holoenzymePolymeraseRNADNAPromoterGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chromatin configuration of DNA inhibits access by enzymes such as RNA polymerase II. This inhibition is alleviated by FACT, a conserved transcription elongation factor that has been found to reconfigure nucleosomes to allow transit along the DNA by RNA polymerase II, thus facilitating transcription. FACT also reorganizes nucleosomes after the passage of RNA polymerase II, as indicated by the effects of certain FACT mutations. The larger of the two subunits of FACT is Spt16/Cdc68, while the smaller is termed SSRP1 (vertebrates) or Pob3 (budding yeast). The HMG-box domain at the C terminus of SSRP1 is absent from Pob3; the function of this domain for yeast FACT is supplied by the small HMG-box protein Nhp6. In yeast, this "detachable" HMG domain is a general chromatin component, unlike FACT, which is found only in transcribed regions and associated with RNA polymerase II. The several domains of the larger FACT subunit are also likely to have different functions. Genetic studies suggest that FACT mediates nucleosome reorganization along several pathways, and reinforce the notion that protein unfolding and (or) refolding is involved in FACT activity for transcription.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207