Verapamil but not calpain or creatine alters arsenate-induced cardiac cell death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the potential of arsenate to induce cardiomyocyte cell death and to explore the cellular mechanisms of arsenate toxicity. Isolated cardiomyocytes in culture from embryonic chick hearts were treated with a pentavalent arsenic species (H3AsO4) or arsenate. Arsenate produced a significant (P < 0.01) concentration-dependent increase in cell death with an EC50 about 1 mM. Cardiomyocytes manifested a loss of actin structure, reduced size, and damaged nuclei. Creatine 0.1-100 uM did not significantly modify arsenate-induced cell death. In contrast, verapamil, 0.01-1 uM, produced a significant concentration-dependent accentuation of arsenate-induced cell death. The effect of verapamil was evident at low concentrations of arsenate, which produced only a small increase in cell death, and at high concentrations of arsenate, which induced a large amount of cell death. Verapamil alone did not alter cardiomyocyte cell death. By comparison, calpain inhibitor II did not modify arsenate-induced cardiomyocyte cell death. These data suggest that cardiomyocytes are vulnerable to the effects of verapamil to increase the cellular toxicity of arsenate. Two potential cellular mechanisms of arsenate toxicity, however, are likely not involved in arsenate toxicity namely calpain activation and reduction of creatine phosphate production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".