MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119684305 · doi:10.1021/nl0509069

Basis and Lattice Polarization Mechanisms for Light Transmission through Nanohole Arrays in a Metal Film

2005· article· en· W2119684305 on OpenAlexafffund
Reuven Gordon, M.C. Hughes, B. Leathem, K. L. Kavanagh, Alexandre G. Brolo

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
KeywordsEllipseExtraordinary optical transmissionPolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsLattice (music)NanophotonicsLattice constantMaterials scienceSurface plasmonCondensed matter physicsPlasmonPhysicsSurface plasmon polaritonDiffractionChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extraordinary light transmission through double-hole and elliptical nanohole arrays in a thin gold film is investigated for different orientations of the holes relative to the lattice. Even though these bases have similar symmetry characteristics, the polarization follows the orientation of the basis for the ellipse but remains fixed along a lattice vector for the double holes. Furthermore, the maximum transmitted intensity for linearly polarized light is constant for the ellipse, but decreases for the double holes as they are rotated away from being aligned with the lattice. Finite-difference time-domain simulations agree well with the experimental findings. These experiments show how the basis determines both the coupling into the surface plasmon waves and the evanescent transmission through the nanoholes. Both of these effects need to be considered when designing nanophotonic devices using the extraordinary transmission phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207