Effect of temperature on somatic growth and survivorship of early post-settled green sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Müller)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A laboratory experiment was run for 171 days to assess growth and survivorship of recently settled juveniles of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Müller), reared at five temperatures: 4.7±0.8, 9.0±1.1, 12.9±1.1, 16.0±1.5 and 19.7±1.3°C (mean±SD, n=7942). Individual sea urchins were housed separately in PVC pots with Nitex mesh bottoms (10 per tank and five replicate tanks per temperature treatment) and fed a combination of benthic diatoms and macroalgae (Porphyra sp.). The test diameter of each urchin was measured and survivorship recorded on a monthly basis. Mean (±SE) test diameter of all individuals at the beginning of the experiment was 2.41±0.03 mm (n=250). At the end of the experiment, mean test diameter (±SE) was significantly larger at 9.0°C (8.46±0.06 mm) and 12.9°C (8.20±0.25 mm) than at 4.7°C (7.27±0.05 mm), 16.0°C (6.72±0.17 mm) and 19.7°C (2.65±0.24 mm) and significantly larger at 4.7 and 16.0°C than at 19.7°C. When growth was expressed as a per cent increase in test diameter from the start of the experiment, however, there were no significant pair-wise differences among 4.7, 9.0, 12.9 and 16.0°C treatments at the end of the experiment, but all these treatments were significantly greater than at 19.7°C. Mean per cent survivorship (±SE) at the end of the experiment for the various temperature treatments was 76.0±6.0%, 90.0±5.5%, 100.0±0.0%, 98.0±2.0% and 26.0±11.2% at 4.7, 9.0, 12.9, 16.0 and 19.7°C respectively. Per cent survivorship was significantly greater at 4.7, 9.0, 12.9 and 16.0°C than at 19.7°C and significantly greater at 12.9 and 16.0°C than at 4.7°C. Mean area increase of urchins per replicate tank at the end of the experiment – taking into account both test diameter growth and survivorship – was significantly larger at 9.0 and 12.9°C than at 4.7, 16.0 and 19.7°C, and significantly larger at 4.7 and 16.0°C than at 19.7°C. The results of this study suggest that young juveniles of S. droebachiensis should be reared at 9–13°C in order to optimize production for aquaculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".