Transdermal Delivery of Bioidentical Progesterone with a Steroid 5α-Reductase Inhibitor (Dutasteride): a Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bioavailability of transdermal progesterone is low and variable. This may be attributed to transdermal metabolism by the 5α-reductase enzymes or the direct transport to the saliva. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of enzyme inhibition on the bioavailability of transdermal progesterone. Serum and salivary progesterone levels were evaluated to gain a better insight into the mechanism progesterone transport across the skin. METHOD: Twenty postmenopausal women with a Follicle Stimulating Hormone > 40IU/L were recruited to take part in the study. The subjects were randomly allocated to either dutasteride (n=10) or placebo (n=10). Each group applied either 500 mg of non ionic cream or dutasteride cream (2mg/g) to the right arm for 2 weeks. This was followed by applying 500 mg of progesterone or progesterone dutasteride cream (equivalent to 40 mg of progesterone) for a further 2 weeks. On day 30 blood and saliva were collected for over 12 hours and progesterone concentration was measured. RESULTS: The baseline progesterone concentration on day zero was 0.1 ng/ml. On day 30 baseline progesterone levels increased significantly (p <0.05) to 1.40 ng/ml and 1.15 ng/ml in the progesterone and dutasteride groups, respectively. Salivary progesterone concentrations were increased by seven fold, from 0.40 ng/ml to 2.9 ng/ml. On average, salivary progesterone concentration was four times the serum levels. CONCLUSION: The average serum and salivary progesterone concentration, Cmax, and the AUC were slightly higher in the dutasteride group, but no significant difference could be noted. Metabolism by the 5α-reductase enzyme is unlikely to affect the bioavailability of progesterone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".