MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119761716 · doi:10.1139/cjb-78-3-409

Differentiation of infection structures of the powdery mildew fungus <i>Uncinula necator</i> and adhesion to the host cuticle

2000· article· en· W2119761716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Rumbolz, H.-H. Kassemeyer, V. Steinmetz, H.B. Deising, K. Mendgen, Daniel Mathys, S. Wirtz, R. Guggenheim

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowdery mildewFungusHost (biology)BiologyAppressoriumBotanyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development and adhesion of infection structures of the grapevine powdery mildew fungus. U~cinu/a necator (Schw.) Burr.. were investigated during the early stages of leaf colonization. Light microscopy showed that pri­ mary appressoria occurred 3.5 h post inoculation (p.i.) and that hyphae on the leaf surface, indicative of successful host colonization, appeared 14 h p.i. Low temperature scanning electron microscopy revealed deposits of extracellular mate­ rial at the contact zone of fungal structures and plant cuticle, suggesting firm attachment of the pathogen. To investi­ gate whether or not esterase or cutinase activity is involved in establishing the fungus on the host cuticle, histochemical assays and inhibitor studies were performed. Results indicated that esterase activity was associated with conidia and infection structures. A single fungal extracellular protein was identified as a cutinase by its ability to hy­ drolyze 3H-cutin. Probing Southern blots of genomic DNA of U necalor, Magnaporlhe grisea, and Fusarium so/ani fsp. pisi with the cutinase gene of F so/ani fsp. pisi suggested that the cutinase gene of U necalor shares only lim­ ited sequence similarities with the cutinase genes of the other fungi investigated. Adhesion assays showed that the pres­ ence of esterase-cutinase inhibitors on the cuticle did not significantly affect adhesion. The role of the enzyme in fungal adhesion is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207