MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119791508 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2008.ecp.96

Energy Aware Provisioning in Solar Powered WLAN Mesh Networks

2008· article· en· W2119791508 on OpenAlexaff
Ghada Badawy, Amir A. Sayegh, T.D. Todd

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProvisioningComputer networkWireless mesh networkNode (physics)Distributed computingMesh networkingResource (disambiguation)WirelessWireless networkEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WLAN mesh networks are often installed to provide wireless coverage for temporary events. In these types of networks, the WLAN mesh nodes can sometimes be operated using an energy sustainable source such as solar power. Resource provisioning consists of pre-assigning each node with a solar panel and battery combination that is sufficient to prevent node outage for the duration of the deployment. This is done by assuming a temporal load profile for each node, which is then used to perform the assignment using historical solar insolation data for the desired deployment location. Unfortunately, this methodology cannot take into account the state dependencies which occur when the network uses energy aware routing, and therefore the system may be over-provisioned. In this paper we propose a methodology for WLAN mesh node resource assignment that incorporates energy aware routing into the assignment algorithm. The problem consists of determining a network-wide minimum cost resource assignment subject to satisfying the input load profile. A genetic algorithm (GA) has been developed for this purpose. Our results show the large resource savings that energy aware resource assignment can achieve when compared to that done using the conventional methodology. We also study the competitive ratio of both resource assignment schemes and show that for small traffic overloading, energy aware routing performs better than shortest path routing in networks which are provisioned using the proposed methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207