MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119864403 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev130

Peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation reduces embryo resorption in older mice

2015· article· en· W2119864403 on OpenAlexafffund
Yong Tao, Dandan Liu, Guolong Mo, Hongmei Wang, X. Johné Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcGill UniversityMarch of Dimes FoundationWayne State UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPutrescineOvulationAndrologyBiologyEndocrinologyResorptionOocyteInternal medicineMedicineEmbryoHormoneBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY QUESTION: Does peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation of older mice improve oocyte quality and reduce the incidence of embryo resorption? SUMMARY ANSWER: Peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation in older mice improved oocyte quality, as indicated by increased blastocyst cell numbers and reduced the incidence of embryo resorption. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Rodents exhibit a transient rise of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) and putrescine in the ovaries during ovulation. Older mice exhibit reduced ovarian ODC activity during ovulation. Supplementation of in vitro maturation medium with putrescine reduces oocyte aneuploidy rates of older mice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The rationale was to correct ovarian putrescine deficiency in older mice by peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation in drinking water and to observe the reproductive consequences of this intervention. This project was conducted between 2010 and 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Older mice (9-11 months of age) were given regular drinking water (control) or drinking water with 1% putrescine dihydrochloride (62 mM) for 2-4 days before mating. Plugged mice were then withdrawn from putrescine supplementation. Blastocysts were retrieved on 3.5 days post coitum (dpc) for the determination of cell numbers. For resorption analyses, mice were killed on 9.5 dp or 12.5 dpc, and implantation sites were dissected to determine the embryo status. For birth studies, mice were examined every morning between 16.5 and 23.5 dpc. Births were recorded as live or stillbirth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We demonstrated that deficiency of ovarian putrescine in older mice can be restored by peri-ovulatory putrescine supplementation in drinking water. Putrescine supplementation in older mice increased blastocyst cell numbers (from 40 to 54; P < 0.0001, t-test), reduced embryo resorption rates (from 41.1 to 15.4% in old C57BL/6 mice, P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test; from 14.2 to 6.4% in old CF1 mice, P = 0.004, Fisher's exact test), and doubled the number of live born pups. Furthermore, exogenous putrescine exhibited rapid absorption and excretion, and showed no toxicity to mothers or fetuses. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The mechanism of putrescine action in oocytes and/or ovaries remains unclear. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Peri-ovulatory putrescine deficiency in older mice appears to adversely impact on oocyte maturation resulting in poor quality embryos (as assessed by blastocyst cell numbers) and early embryo death. This study demonstrates a natural and simple remedy to improve oocyte quality in older women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the NSERC, the March of Dimes Foundation, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declare no competing interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207