MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119913064 · doi:10.1306/031003730653

Deepening-Upward Subtidal Cycles, Murray Basin, South Australia

2003· article· en· W2119913064 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeff J. Lukasik, Noël P. James

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityPetro-CanadaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinOceanographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Decimeter-scale, deepening-upward cycles are the basic depositional motif of Oligocene-Miocene Murray Supergroup limestones in the Murray Basin, southeastern Australia. Cycles formed in this large intracratonic basin on a centripetal, temperate-water epeiric ramp. They reflect generation by trophic resource-influenced carbonate production under mostly transgressive conditions. Listed from the base up, each cycle is ideally composed of five parts: Part A—biotically depauperate carbonates reflecting relatively shallow-water, restricted, variably stressed highly mesotrophic environments; Part B—increasingly biotically diverse limestones recording progressively more physical energy and less mesotrophic conditions upward; OM1—a conspicuous hardground to firmground surface formed during late transgression to stillstand during which wave sweeping and reworking contributed to omission and lithification; Part C—relatively biotically diverse, epifauna-dominant sediments that were highly abraded during periods of condensed sedimentation under marginally oligotrophic conditions; and OM2 (cycle boundary)—a rarely conspicuous surface representing arrested sedimentation and variable cementation as trophic resources increased and conditions for carbonate production deteriorated. Ten cycle types are grouped into four major styles; clay cycles, mollusc cycles, echinoid cycles, and bryozoan cycles. These are interpreted to form a lithological continuum from inner restricted terrigenous locales to outer, open marine, bryozoan-colonized environments. Deepening-upward cycles were profoundly sensitive to autogenic factors such as nutrient influx, terrigenous content and turbidity, hydrodynamic energy, water temperature, salinity, and water depth manifested in this intracratonic setting. Although these cycles share a similar sedimentological motif and hydrodynamic energy-based cycle-capping process with open shelf, epicratonic, shallowing-upward subtidal cycles of Tertiary age, they formed in a very different way reflecting the distinctive intracratonic environment in which they formed. Murray Basin cycles preserve a record of relative sea-level rise whereas open shelf cycles accumulated mostly during relative sea-level fall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207