Genetic Relationships Between Persistency and Reproductive Performance in First-Lactation Canadian Holsteins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to estimate genetic relationships between lactation persistency and reproductive performance in first lactation. Relationships with day in milk at peak milk yield and estimated 305-d milk yield were also investigated. The data set contained 33,312 first-lactation Canadian Holsteins with first-parity reproductive, persistency, and productive information. Reproductive performance traits included age at first insemination, nonreturn rate at 56 d after first insemination as a virgin heifer and as a first-lactation cow, calving difficulty at first calving and calving interval between first and second calving. Lactation persistency was defined as the Wilmink b parameter for milk yield and was calculated by fitting lactation curves to test day records using a multiple-trait prediction procedure. An 8-trait genetic analysis was performed using the Variance Component Estimation package (VCE 5) via Gibbs sampling to estimate genetic parameters for all traits. Heritabilities of persistency, day in milk at peak milk yield and estimated 305-d milk yield were 0.18, 0.09 and 0.45, respectively. Heritabilities of reproduction were low and ranged from 0.03 to 0.19. The highest heritability was for age at first insemination. Heifer reproductive traits were lowly genetically correlated, whereas cow reproductive traits were moderately correlated. Heifers younger than average when first inseminated and/or conceived successfully at first insemination tended to have a more persistent first lactation. First lactation was more persistent if heifers had difficulty calving (r(g) = 0.43), or conceived successfully at first insemination in first lactation (r(g) = 0.32) or had a longer interval between first and second calving (r(g) = 0.17). Estimates of genetic correlations of reproductive performance with estimated 305-d milk yield were different in magnitude, but similar in sign to those with persistency (0.02 to 0.51).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".